Exclsuive reports from the inner cities in Blaired Britain
Editor in Chief
©MUHAMMAD HAQUE.
These pages are regularly updated and the contents moved from here and archived after short displays.
The 1st Edition 1000 Hrs GMT / 1100 Hrs UK time Saturday May 2006
LEGAL NOTICE
The materials published here are originally authored items that are only published for education and information purposes only.
None of the materials is intended for any commercial, party political, unethical, immoral purposes or uses or applications disseminations or citations whatever.
None of the material must be referred to without the full legal and moral parameters being recognised and that recognition must be reasonably and accurately identical to one that is hereby and herewith stated and implied.
All legal and authoring rights belong to the rights-holders who are identified with each appropriate items
Permission must be sought before any material is used in anyway that the law and morality warrant should be done only by seeking the authors’ and the rights holder’s prior written permission.
Where no by-line is included the IPRs and other rights are asserted by the Editor in chief and by the publishing organisation the AADHIKAR Foundation.
These pages are regularly updated and the contents moved from here and archived after short displays. The Oldest files posted here will be deleted or moved off this site or pages first.
Visitors and viewers are advised to bear this fact in mind.
To access the AADHIKAR library and archives, please send your name and postal address and specify the date and subject [starting from 19 December 1980 to the present date]
CLICK HERE to send an email request or to send an email directly from your own e-mail sender to aadhikarlibrary@yahoo.co.uk
To send a general e-mail to AADHIKARonline, CLICK HERE, or send an e-mail directly from your own e-mail sender by using our e-mail addressaadhikaronline@yahho.co.uk
To VIEW a Khoodeelaaronline campaign against CrossRail hole file about the ouster from Tower Hamlets Council of CrossRail-hole-promoter Michael Keith posted on Friday 5 May 2006 on the UK indymedia site, CLICK HERE
From 1400 Hrs GMT on Saturday 6 May 2006 on AADHIKARonline exclusive news and commentary including these new features::
Muhammad Haque Daily commentary
Review of the British press
Review of the British legal system
AADHIKARonline Literature focussing on the politics of ‘the arts’
From the previous edition published as the 8th Edition 2000 Hrs GMT / 2100Hrs UK time Friday 5 May 2006
What is the East London Idiotiser going to say now about the corrupt clique that they frenetically plugged away for and quite wrongly dishonestly, untruthfully credited [!] for bringing the CrossRail hole problem to the East End of London?
And how is their commercial stablemate the ‘Tower Hamlets Recorder’ going to ‘celebrate’ the Lib Dems’ sinking as the ‘main Opposition’ Party on the Tower Hamlets Council? And the vanishing of Janet Ludlow?
By Muhammad Haque, Organiser, Khoodeelaar! No to Crossrail hole
2000 Hrs GMT Friday 5 May 2006
The role of the East London Idiotiser in promoting the crossrail hole attacks plan on the East End of London is now due for ted detailed examination that the Khoodeelaar! Organisation had promised before the ‘elections’ held on 4 May 2006
Just before the idiotising regime of Richard Tidiman was abruptly ended, he carried one of those mentally lazy and half-conscious pieces that no knowledgeable, competent et6hical commentator or ‘reporter’ of any dignity should allow to be published in their medium or outlet
the significance of that lazy Idiotiser piece plugging for Crassrail was in the fact that only a year before then, the same publication had splashed on the Khoodeelaar! Camapgn demonstration [held on Friday 22 October 2004] [This date was printed in error as 22 October 2006 in the previous edition of this page of the aadhikaronline] against the then ‘leader’ of tower hamlets council, helal abbas.
the east london Idiotiser’s splash on the khoodeelaar! Organisation’s demonstration did not, include the word khoodeelaar!. And it did not mention the name of the main speaker, either.
yet for the entirely of that demonstration, the khoodeelaar organiser maintained in a very detailed, factual narrative that was published in that speech for the first time.
although given in, the speech contained facts, statistics, analyses of the environmental, legal, social, economic consigns of the crossrail, hole plan, stuff that no local or national [let alone parliamentary - in the sense of being either stated or initiated or originated in or by anyone in the UK Houses of Parliament, on the subject of the crossrail hole Bill] speaker or commentator had made before on the subject of the crossrail hole attack plan against the brick lane london e1 area.
When the EAST LONDON IDIOTISER came to ‘report’ on that demonstration, it failed to mention a single one of those items.
It lied in its report by presenting that report as if it had in any way been organised by another party.
That lie was in the fact that the superimposed the name and the political image of an impostor outfit instead of plainly acknowledging the plain fact. The fact that their own 'staff' commissioned photographer had recdio4rded for over an hour of non-stop photography.
The paper has not cased to be a racist parasitic publication which is prone to perpetuate the poisonous lie that no multi-racial leadership of the community should be seen as normal
Except when it is possible to suggest in a plug piece for an dubiously aligned and promoted alleged adviser to the supreme social corrupter of London, Ken Livingstone.
[To be continued]
From the previous, 7th, edition Friday 5 May 2006
Why Khoodeelaar! campaign against Crossrail hole plot has been vindicated on how an undemocratic, dishonest set of local councillors cannot be left alone where it comes to the community’s rights
By Muhammad Haque, organiser, Khoodeelaar! No to CrossRail hole Bill campaign
1730 GMT London Friday 5 May 2006
Tower Hamlets Council elections held on 4 May 2006, were fraught with fraud, fraudulence and fear.
Fraud connected with the administration of the elections by the Borough’s ‘returning officer’ Christine Gilbert who allowed her mismanagement to tolerate or even to engender an atmosphere that was conducive to the mass theft of votes via postal excuses.
Fraudulence was allowed to prevail on such a wide scale that a stunningly corrupt plot was hatched in wards like [but not only in] the Brick Lane area [mis-named on the Tower Hamlets Council’s official list of Ward names as ‘Spitalfields and Banglatown’] with the sole object of robbing the electorate of its democratic franchise.
This is seen in the composition of the ‘elected’ Tower Hamlets council now
We have again been lumbered with another corrupt clique that will in all intents and purposes stand in the community’s way and will sabotage the community’s campaign against the CrossRail hole
How id the corrupt elements get back in?
The answer is – by corrupt means>Then the question arises:- wasn’t Christine Gilbert supposed to look out as the returning officer to prevent corruption?
Had Christine Gilbert not been told that her conduct as the ‘acting’ returning officer at the May 2005 general elections were shamble?
So why didn't she not address those concerns expressed in May 2005>
Why did she allow the year to pass and for the same , or in some cases even worse,. Shambles to occur around the voters’ most precious token of democratic rights?
Christine Gilbert has not answered these questions
She can’t
because if she even attempts to answer these questions then the secret agenda which she is in place to advance will be exposed
[To be continued]
From the previous editions 5 May 2006:
Which ‘leading’ ‘Labour councillor’ acted as the second ‘Brick Lane area mafia boss’ to fix the elections results that have now been ‘declared in their favour’? Khoodeelaar to ask Police to investigate allegations of bribery that has been carried out by the abuses of Tower Hamlets Council cash and facilities
An aadhikaronline investigation-part 1 Filed 1040 GMT Friday 5 May 2006
The ‘results’, whatever the final count, were produced in a significant way, by the sue of bribery carried out at the initiative of a number of [officially-registered as ] Labour Party candidates whop have been declared as re-elected councillors.
We understand that a number of those including at least two in the Brick Lane London E1 area, in fact sued bribes, and other council-linked resources to secure the ‘block’ votes which were delivered through the misuse of Council-paid grants to these community groups
The groups include at least one ‘religious’ body whose ‘management committee’ acted as the agency for the bribery and the corruption of the electoral system
Early indications on Friday 5 May 2006 from campaigning group Khoodeelaar! have shown that they would refer the allegations to the Police as soon as certain formalities have been completed.
Tower Hamlets Council web site is not working
Who in what ‘community organisations’ were paid how much bribe by sitting councillors to produce the results in Tower Hamlets?
From a previous edition: Friday 5 May 2006 An aadhikaronline report 0910 GMT
Just as the corrupt clique on Tower Hamlets Council got a serious blow with its key cliquester Michael Keith being kicked out of the Shadwell by the voters, so was its propaganda outfit showing signs of treachery.
aadhikaronline writers contacted the Council’s ‘web team’ who could not give any acceptable explanation except to confirm the undeniable that their web site was down. They could not say either when the site would be operating again.
Tower Hamlets Council officials delaying publication of full results.
The reasons have not been explained either.
We shall be reporting on that delay and the associated tactics by what must be the servants of the corrupt clique which has just – AADHIKARonline RESULTS and analysis of the Local Council elections, in Tower Hamlets and elsewhere in London will be published here throughout the day Friday 5 May 2006. We should have been given the results by now by the Christine Gilbert ‘returning officer’ staff but they have been unavailable at the time of publishing this edition
. To send a general e-mail to AADHIKARonline, CLICK HERE, or send an e-mail directly from your own e-mail sender by using our e-mail address aadhikaronline@yahoo.co.uk
. To make a direct communication on a mater of policy addressing the Editor and Publisher, CLICK HERE, or send an e-mail directly from your own e-mail sender by using our e-mail address aadhikareditor@yahoo.co.uk
©MUHAMMAD HAQUE.
These pages are regularly updated and the contents moved from here and archived after short displays.
The 1st Edition 1000 Hrs GMT / 1100 Hrs UK time Saturday May 2006
LEGAL NOTICE
The materials published here are originally authored items that are only published for education and information purposes only.
None of the materials is intended for any commercial, party political, unethical, immoral purposes or uses or applications disseminations or citations whatever.
None of the material must be referred to without the full legal and moral parameters being recognised and that recognition must be reasonably and accurately identical to one that is hereby and herewith stated and implied.
All legal and authoring rights belong to the rights-holders who are identified with each appropriate items
Permission must be sought before any material is used in anyway that the law and morality warrant should be done only by seeking the authors’ and the rights holder’s prior written permission.
Where no by-line is included the IPRs and other rights are asserted by the Editor in chief and by the publishing organisation the AADHIKAR Foundation.
These pages are regularly updated and the contents moved from here and archived after short displays. The Oldest files posted here will be deleted or moved off this site or pages first.
Visitors and viewers are advised to bear this fact in mind.
To access the AADHIKAR library and archives, please send your name and postal address and specify the date and subject [starting from 19 December 1980 to the present date]
CLICK HERE to send an email request or to send an email directly from your own e-mail sender to aadhikarlibrary@yahoo.co.uk
To send a general e-mail to AADHIKARonline, CLICK HERE, or send an e-mail directly from your own e-mail sender by using our e-mail addressaadhikaronline@yahho.co.uk
To VIEW a Khoodeelaaronline campaign against CrossRail hole file about the ouster from Tower Hamlets Council of CrossRail-hole-promoter Michael Keith posted on Friday 5 May 2006 on the UK indymedia site, CLICK HERE
From 1400 Hrs GMT on Saturday 6 May 2006 on AADHIKARonline exclusive news and commentary including these new features::
Muhammad Haque Daily commentary
Review of the British press
Review of the British legal system
AADHIKARonline Literature focussing on the politics of ‘the arts’
From the previous edition published as the 8th Edition 2000 Hrs GMT / 2100Hrs UK time Friday 5 May 2006
What is the East London Idiotiser going to say now about the corrupt clique that they frenetically plugged away for and quite wrongly dishonestly, untruthfully credited [!] for bringing the CrossRail hole problem to the East End of London?
And how is their commercial stablemate the ‘Tower Hamlets Recorder’ going to ‘celebrate’ the Lib Dems’ sinking as the ‘main Opposition’ Party on the Tower Hamlets Council? And the vanishing of Janet Ludlow?
By Muhammad Haque, Organiser, Khoodeelaar! No to Crossrail hole
2000 Hrs GMT Friday 5 May 2006
The role of the East London Idiotiser in promoting the crossrail hole attacks plan on the East End of London is now due for ted detailed examination that the Khoodeelaar! Organisation had promised before the ‘elections’ held on 4 May 2006
Just before the idiotising regime of Richard Tidiman was abruptly ended, he carried one of those mentally lazy and half-conscious pieces that no knowledgeable, competent et6hical commentator or ‘reporter’ of any dignity should allow to be published in their medium or outlet
the significance of that lazy Idiotiser piece plugging for Crassrail was in the fact that only a year before then, the same publication had splashed on the Khoodeelaar! Camapgn demonstration [held on Friday 22 October 2004] [This date was printed in error as 22 October 2006 in the previous edition of this page of the aadhikaronline] against the then ‘leader’ of tower hamlets council, helal abbas.
the east london Idiotiser’s splash on the khoodeelaar! Organisation’s demonstration did not, include the word khoodeelaar!. And it did not mention the name of the main speaker, either.
yet for the entirely of that demonstration, the khoodeelaar organiser maintained in a very detailed, factual narrative that was published in that speech for the first time.
although given in, the speech contained facts, statistics, analyses of the environmental, legal, social, economic consigns of the crossrail, hole plan, stuff that no local or national [let alone parliamentary - in the sense of being either stated or initiated or originated in or by anyone in the UK Houses of Parliament, on the subject of the crossrail hole Bill] speaker or commentator had made before on the subject of the crossrail hole attack plan against the brick lane london e1 area.
When the EAST LONDON IDIOTISER came to ‘report’ on that demonstration, it failed to mention a single one of those items.
It lied in its report by presenting that report as if it had in any way been organised by another party.
That lie was in the fact that the superimposed the name and the political image of an impostor outfit instead of plainly acknowledging the plain fact. The fact that their own 'staff' commissioned photographer had recdio4rded for over an hour of non-stop photography.
The paper has not cased to be a racist parasitic publication which is prone to perpetuate the poisonous lie that no multi-racial leadership of the community should be seen as normal
Except when it is possible to suggest in a plug piece for an dubiously aligned and promoted alleged adviser to the supreme social corrupter of London, Ken Livingstone.
[To be continued]
From the previous, 7th, edition Friday 5 May 2006
Why Khoodeelaar! campaign against Crossrail hole plot has been vindicated on how an undemocratic, dishonest set of local councillors cannot be left alone where it comes to the community’s rights
By Muhammad Haque, organiser, Khoodeelaar! No to CrossRail hole Bill campaign
1730 GMT London Friday 5 May 2006
Tower Hamlets Council elections held on 4 May 2006, were fraught with fraud, fraudulence and fear.
Fraud connected with the administration of the elections by the Borough’s ‘returning officer’ Christine Gilbert who allowed her mismanagement to tolerate or even to engender an atmosphere that was conducive to the mass theft of votes via postal excuses.
Fraudulence was allowed to prevail on such a wide scale that a stunningly corrupt plot was hatched in wards like [but not only in] the Brick Lane area [mis-named on the Tower Hamlets Council’s official list of Ward names as ‘Spitalfields and Banglatown’] with the sole object of robbing the electorate of its democratic franchise.
This is seen in the composition of the ‘elected’ Tower Hamlets council now
We have again been lumbered with another corrupt clique that will in all intents and purposes stand in the community’s way and will sabotage the community’s campaign against the CrossRail hole
How id the corrupt elements get back in?
The answer is – by corrupt means>Then the question arises:- wasn’t Christine Gilbert supposed to look out as the returning officer to prevent corruption?
Had Christine Gilbert not been told that her conduct as the ‘acting’ returning officer at the May 2005 general elections were shamble?
So why didn't she not address those concerns expressed in May 2005>
Why did she allow the year to pass and for the same , or in some cases even worse,. Shambles to occur around the voters’ most precious token of democratic rights?
Christine Gilbert has not answered these questions
She can’t
because if she even attempts to answer these questions then the secret agenda which she is in place to advance will be exposed
[To be continued]
From the previous editions 5 May 2006:
Which ‘leading’ ‘Labour councillor’ acted as the second ‘Brick Lane area mafia boss’ to fix the elections results that have now been ‘declared in their favour’? Khoodeelaar to ask Police to investigate allegations of bribery that has been carried out by the abuses of Tower Hamlets Council cash and facilities
An aadhikaronline investigation-part 1 Filed 1040 GMT Friday 5 May 2006
The ‘results’, whatever the final count, were produced in a significant way, by the sue of bribery carried out at the initiative of a number of [officially-registered as ] Labour Party candidates whop have been declared as re-elected councillors.
We understand that a number of those including at least two in the Brick Lane London E1 area, in fact sued bribes, and other council-linked resources to secure the ‘block’ votes which were delivered through the misuse of Council-paid grants to these community groups
The groups include at least one ‘religious’ body whose ‘management committee’ acted as the agency for the bribery and the corruption of the electoral system
Early indications on Friday 5 May 2006 from campaigning group Khoodeelaar! have shown that they would refer the allegations to the Police as soon as certain formalities have been completed.
Tower Hamlets Council web site is not working
Who in what ‘community organisations’ were paid how much bribe by sitting councillors to produce the results in Tower Hamlets?
From a previous edition: Friday 5 May 2006 An aadhikaronline report 0910 GMT
Just as the corrupt clique on Tower Hamlets Council got a serious blow with its key cliquester Michael Keith being kicked out of the Shadwell by the voters, so was its propaganda outfit showing signs of treachery.
aadhikaronline writers contacted the Council’s ‘web team’ who could not give any acceptable explanation except to confirm the undeniable that their web site was down. They could not say either when the site would be operating again.
Tower Hamlets Council officials delaying publication of full results.
The reasons have not been explained either.
We shall be reporting on that delay and the associated tactics by what must be the servants of the corrupt clique which has just – AADHIKARonline RESULTS and analysis of the Local Council elections, in Tower Hamlets and elsewhere in London will be published here throughout the day Friday 5 May 2006. We should have been given the results by now by the Christine Gilbert ‘returning officer’ staff but they have been unavailable at the time of publishing this edition
. To send a general e-mail to AADHIKARonline, CLICK HERE, or send an e-mail directly from your own e-mail sender by using our e-mail address aadhikaronline@yahoo.co.uk
. To make a direct communication on a mater of policy addressing the Editor and Publisher, CLICK HERE, or send an e-mail directly from your own e-mail sender by using our e-mail address aadhikareditor@yahoo.co.uk
posted by editormuhammadHaque at 3:12 AM
0 Comments:
Post a Comment
<< Home